top of page

JP Morgan Drops Out!




### JPMorgan Chase Bids Farewell to Climate Action 100+: A Strategic Pivot Towards In-House Sustainability

In a move that has sent ripples across the finance and environmental sectors, JPMorgan Chase, alongside other institutional investors such as BlackRock and State Street Global Advisors (SSGA), announced significant changes in their approach to combating global warming. Departing from the Climate Action 100+ alliance, a UN-backed initiative aimed at fostering corporate sustainability to fight climate change, these financial behemoths have declared a shift towards enhancing their internal sustainability frameworks.


Why the Departure?

JPMorgan Chase's decision to step away from the Climate Action 100+ stems from a strategic enhancement of its in-house capabilities to tackle environmental issues. The bank has significantly expanded its sustainability team and established a robust climate risk framework, reflecting a deep commitment to sustainable investing. With a dedicated team of 40 sustainable investing professionals, including investment stewardship specialists backed by a substantial buy-side research team, JPMorgan is poised to lead its climate initiatives from within.


BlackRock and SSGA have echoed similar sentiments, pointing to the alliance's overly ambitious climate initiatives and potential legal complications as reasons for their reevaluation. These moves underline a broader concern within the financial industry about the practical implications of external climate commitments and the importance of aligning such initiatives with the institutions' operational realities and regulatory landscapes.

Implications for ESG and Climate Advocacy


This pivot marks a critical juncture in the role of financial institutions in environmental advocacy. While the withdrawal from the Climate Action 100+ could be perceived as a step back in collective action against global warming, it also highlights the evolving nature of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) strategies. By bolstering their in-house teams and frameworks, JPMorgan Chase, BlackRock, and SSGA are reinforcing their dedication to sustainability, albeit through a more individualized approach.


The announcements come at a time when ESG priorities, particularly those related to climate change, are under intense scrutiny. Pressure from consumer advocates and Republican states has mounted, challenging the financial sector's commitment to these issues. However, the strategic shift by some of its largest players suggests a nuanced perspective on how best to achieve sustainable outcomes.

Looking Ahead


As JPMorgan Chase and its peers forge their paths in sustainable investing, the financial industry watches closely. The move away from the Climate Action 100+ does not signify a retreat from climate action but rather a recalibration of strategies to better fit the institutions' capabilities and stewardship goals. It remains to be seen how this approach will influence the broader ESG landscape and the collective fight against global warming.

As these developments unfold, the dialogue around corporate sustainability, climate risk, and the role of financial institutions in environmental stewardship will undoubtedly continue to evolve. What is clear is the unwavering commitment of these institutions to navigate the complexities of ESG investing, with an eye towards impactful, sustainable outcomes.


10 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All