Voter fraud and election fraud are two distinct but related forms of electoral malfeasance that can undermine the democratic process. While voter fraud refers to individual acts of deception or misconduct during the voting process, election fraud encompasses a broader range of activities that involve tampering with the electoral process on a larger scale.
Voter fraud typically includes practices such as double voting, impersonation, vote buying, and casting fraudulent absentee ballots. These activities are carried out by individual voters who seek to manipulate the outcome of an election by dishonest means. Voter fraud is considered to be relatively rare, and its impact on election outcomes is generally minimal.
Election fraud, on the other hand, involves a more systematic effort to manipulate the electoral process, often by individuals or groups in positions of power. It can include activities like ballot stuffing, voter suppression, tampering with voting machines, or manipulating vote counts. Election fraud is more likely to have a significant impact on election outcomes, as it often involves coordinated efforts to alter the results.
As for the issue of arresting a machine versus a person, it is true that you cannot arrest a machine. Voting machines, for instance, can be tampered with or hacked, but they are inanimate objects and cannot be held legally responsible for their actions. However, individuals who engage in activities that involve tampering with or manipulating voting machines can be held accountable under the law.
In cases of voter fraud or election fraud, it is essential to identify and prosecute the individuals responsible for these acts. This may include voters who have engaged in fraudulent activities or election officials who have manipulated the electoral process. By holding individuals accountable for their actions, the integrity of the democratic process can be preserved and trust in the system can be maintained.
In conclusion, both voter fraud and election fraud undermine the democratic process, but they differ in scale and impact. Voter fraud involves individual acts of deception, while election fraud is more systematic and can have a greater influence on election outcomes. While machines cannot be arrested, individuals who engage in fraudulent activities, either on a small or large scale, can be prosecuted and held accountable for their actions.